Trump Cuts NASA Budget by $6 Billion!! In Exchange for a Shot at Winning the Mars Race
On May 2, the Trump administration sent shockwaves through the space industry by proposing a massive 24% budget cut to NASA—amounting to about $6 billion. This would reduce NASA’s 2025 budget from $24.8 billion to around $18.8 billion.
The non-profit organization Planetary Society stated that this is one of the most severe budget reductions in NASA’s 67-year history.
Content
Major Projects Canceled or Delayed Due to High Costs
This budget cut has led to the cancellation or delay of several major projects, including:
- SLS (Space Launch System) rocket
- Orion capsule
- Gateway space station
The U.S. government said that the costs were too high as the main reason. For example, the SLS rocket costs around $4 billion per launch—about 140% over the original budget. As a result, the government decided to replace it with more cost-effective private sector systems.
The Artemis III mission—planned to land humans on the Moon in 2027—will be the last to use the SLS and Orion before they are retired. Although Lockheed Martin had contracts to produce Orion capsules for future Artemis missions, those are also likely to be canceled.
The Gateway station, being built by Northrop Grumman under a $935 million contract to create a lunar space station, also faces potential cancellation. This is despite Gateway’s important role in both transportation and scientific research.
Despite cutting many programs, the Trump administration maintained a clear vision for continuing space exploration—particularly of the Moon and Mars—to compete with China. The budget includes an additional $1 billion for exploration missions using commercial systems that are more efficient and cost-effective.
The government remains interested in key projects like the Mars Sample Return Mission, a collaboration between NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA). However, this mission may also be delayed due to its high cost.
This budget cut represents a strategic shift in U.S. space exploration—from government-run projects to depending more on the private sector. The belief is that commercial systems offer more flexibility and better value for money, even if it means canceling or postponing the most important missions.
If the U.S. government agrees to the new budget, the U.S. will still try to explore the Moon and Mars, but potentially under the leadership of private companies instead of NASA. This move is seen as necessary for the U.S. to remain competitive with China in the race for space dominance.
Reference
- Popular tags | NASA
About the Author
ACU-Exchange
We are committed to providing the best foreign currency exchange experience and customer satisfaction to meet the needs of Thais who want to travel abroad and foreigners who come to continue their studies or work in Thailand.
